|
|
Evolution vs.
Intelligent Design
by Samuel Blumenfeld |
Back in 1987, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a 1981
Louisiana law which mandated a balanced treatment in teaching
evolution and creation in the public schools. The Court decided
that the intent of the law "was clearly to advance the
religious viewpoint that a supernatural being created
humankind," and therefore violated the First Amendment's
prohibition on a government establishment of religion. In other
words, the Court adopted the atheist position that creation is a
religious myth.
In speaking for the majority, Justice William J. Brennan wrote:
"The legislative history documents that the act's primary
purpose was to change the science curriculum of public schools in
order to provide an advantage to a particular religious doctrine
that rejects the factual basis of evolution in its
entirety."
Of course, no one bothered to remind the learned justice that
some of the world's greatest scientists were and are devout
Christians, and that it is atheism that is destroying true
science, not religion. Also, Justice Brennan seemed to be totally
unaware that an "establishment of religion" meant a
state-sanctioned church, such as they have in England with the
Anglican Church, which is the official Church of England. Belief
in God is not an establishment of religion. Belief in a
supernatural being who created mankind is not an establishment of
religion.
Also, there is no factual basis to key tenets of evolutionary
theory. The fossil record shows no intermediary forms of species
development. No scientist has been able to mate a dog with a
donkey and get something in between.
But homeschoolers, although not affected by what the court forces
on government schools, should know how to refute the fairy tale
called the Theory of Evolution. Justice Brennan called it fact,
which simply indicates the depth of his ignorance.
First, what exactly is the Theory of Evolution? For the answer,
we must go to the source: Charles Darwin's The Origin of
Species, published in 1859. Darwin claimed that the thousands
of different species of animals, insects and plants that exist on
Earth were not the works of a divine creator who made each
species in its present immutable form, as described in Genesis,
but are the products of a very long, natural process of
development from simpler organic forms to more complex organisms.
Thus, according to Darwin, species continue to change or
"evolve," through a process of natural selection in
which nature's harsh conditions permit only the fittest to
survive in more adaptable forms.
Darwin also believed that all life originated from a single
source - a kind of primeval slime in which the first living
organisms formed spontaneously out of non-living matter through a
random process - by accident.
The first false idea in the theory is that non-organic matter can
transform itself into organic matter. Pasteur proved that this
was impossible. Second, the enormous complexity of organic matter
precludes accidental creation. There had to be a designer. There
is now a whole scientific school devoted to the Design Theory.
William A. Dembski's book, Intelligent Design, published
in 1999, is the pioneering work that bridges science with
theology. Dembski writes:
Intelligent design is three things: a scientific research
program that investigates the effects of intelligent causes; an
intellectual movement that challenges Darwinism and its
naturalistic legacy; and a way of understanding divine action ...
It was Darwin's expulsion of design from biology that made
possible the triumph of naturalism in Western culture. So, too,
it will be intelligent design's restatement of design within
biology that will be the undoing of naturalism in Western
culture.
Dembski proves that design is "empirically detectable,"
because we can observe it all around us. The birth of a child is
a miracle of design. The habits of your household cat is a
miracle of design. All cats do the same things. These are the
inherited characteristics of the species. The idea that accident
could create such complex behavior passed on to successive
generations simply doesn't make sense. The complexity of design
proves the existence of God. Dembski also notes:
Indeed within theism divine action is the most basic mode of
causation since any other mode of causation involves creatures
which themselves were created in a divine act. Intelligent design
thus becomes a unifying framework for understanding both divine
and human agency and illuminates several longstanding
philosophical problems about the nature of reality and our
knowledge of it.
Intelligent design is certainly proven by the fact that
every living organism lives through a programmed cycle of birth,
growth and, finally, death. That very specific program is
contained in the tiniest embryo at the time of conception. The
embryo of a cow probably does not look any different from the
embryo of a human being. But each has been programmed
differently: one creates a cow, the other a human being.
In the case of the latter, that tiny embryo contains an
incredibly complex biological program that causes the individual
to be born, pass through infancy and childhood, develop into
maturity, middle age, old age and, finally, death - a process
that takes sometimes as much as a hundred years. How can an
accident know what is going to happen 100 years after it has
happened?
But since intelligent design infers the existence of a
designer - God - it is likely that evolutionists will resist any
change in their views, since the acknowledgment of the existence
of God is too nightmarish for them to cotemplate.
© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com. Reprinted with permission. Dr.
Samuel L. Blumenfeld is the author of eight books on education,
including: Is Public Education Necessary? NEA: Trojan
Horse in American Education," The Whole Language/OBE
Fraud" and Homeschooling: A Parent's
Guide to Teaching Children. His books are available on
Amazon.com. Back issues of his incisive newsletter, The
Blumenfeld Education Letter, are available online.
TSS
September
/ October 2005 The Sabbath Sentinel
|