|
May - June 2000 The Sabbath Sentinel
President's Letter . . .
Sunday Roots
Dr. Sidney Davis, BSA President
|
|
In 321 AD "Emperor" Constantine declared Sunday a civil
holiday of the Roman Empire; yet, it was later, at the
1st Ecumenical Council of Nicea in Bithynia during June,
325 AD (convened by Constantine), that "the Church" and
the State, together, conferred a liturgical
sanctification to Sunday: an act which usurped the
Sabbath when it expressly denounced and condemned the
Jewish roots of the Christian faith. Protestant church
historians see this event as the beginning of Roman
Catholicism as "the State religion." While this is
admitted, many are not familiar with the actual document
that gives the rationale for this change [from the
Sabbath to Sunday]. Understanding the origins of the
change might give many a greater appreciation of other
truths that were affected by the decision that brought
it about.
Why did the action of the Nicene council turn from the
established orthodoxy handed down by Christ and the
apostles? The answer to this query comes when we see
what was at the heart of this issue: an issue which
resulted in a great change in church doctrine and
beliefs. Such major dogmatic changes continue to affect
Christians (even we Sabbatarians) until this very day.
(Could it be that we Sabbatarians are also the
recipients of this false belief system, and the
attitudes that generated it, today?)
Constantine I: On the Keeping of Easter
From the Letter of Constantine Emperor Augustus to the
Churches and all those not present at the Council (found
in Eusebius, Vita Const., Lib. iii., 18-20):
"When the question relative to the sacred festival of
Easter arose, it was universally thought that it would
be convenient that all should keep the feast on one
day; for what could be more beautiful and more
desirable, than to see this festival, through which we
receive the hope of immortality, celebrated by all
with one accord, and in the same manner? It was
declared to be particularly unworthy for this, the
holiest of all festivals, to follow the
custom [the calculation] of the
Jews, who had soiled their hands with the
most fearful of crimes, and whose minds were
blinded. In rejecting their custom, we may
transmit to our descendants the legitimate mode of
celebrating Easter, which we have observed
from the time of the Saviour's Passion to the present
day [according to the day of the week]. We ought
not, therefore, to have anything in common with the
Jews, for the Saviour has shown us another way;
our worship follows a more legitimate and more
convenient course; and consequently, in unanimously
adopting this mode, we desire, dearest
brethren, to separate ourselves from the detestable
company of the Jews, for it is truly shameful for us
to hear them boast that without their direction we
could not keep this feast. How can they be in
the right, they who, after the death of the Saviour,
have no longer been led by reason but by wild
violence, as their delusion may urge them? They do not
possess the truth in this Easter question; for, in
their blindness and repugnance to all improvements,
they frequently celebrate two Passovers in the same
year.
We could not imitate those who are openly in
error. How, then, could we follow these Jews, who are
most certainly blinded by error? For to celebrate the
passover twice in one year is totally
inadmissible. But even if this were not so, it would
still be your dutynot to tarnish your soul by
communications with such wicked people [the
Jews]. Besides, consider well, that in such an
important matter, and on a subject of such great
solemnity, there ought not to be any division. Our
Saviour has left us only one festal day of our
redemption, that is to say, of his holy passion, and
he desired [to establish] only one Catholic
Church. Think, then, how unseemly it is, that on the
same day some should be fasting whilst others are
seated at a banquet; and that after Easter, some
should be rejoicing at feasts, whilst others are still
observing a strict fast. For this reason, a Divine
Providence wills that this custom should be rectified
and regulated in a uniform way; and everyone, I hope,
will agree upon this point. As, on the one hand,
it is our duty not to have anything in common
with the murderers of our Lord;and as, on the
other, the custom now followed by the Churches of the
West, of the South, and of the North, and by some of
those of the East, is the most acceptable, it has
appeared good to all; and I have been guarantee for
your consent, that you would accept it with joy, as it
is followed at Rome, in Africa, in all Italy, Egypt,
Spain, Gaul, Britain, Libya, in all Achaia, and in the
dioceses of Asia, of Pontus, and Cilicia. You should
consider not only that the number of churches in these
provinces make a majority, but also that it is right
to demand what our reason approves, and that
we should have nothing in common with the
Jews. To sum up in few words: By the
unanimous judgment of all, it has been decided that
the most holy festival of Easter should be
everywhere celebrated on one and the same
day, and it is not seemly that in so holy a
thing there should be any division. As this is the
state of the case, accept joyfully the divine favour,
and this truly divine command; for all which takes
place in assemblies of the bishops ought to be
regarded as proceeding from the will of God
.
Make known to your brethren what has been decreed,
keep this most holy day according to the prescribed
mode; we can thus celebrate this holy Easter day at
the same time, if it is granted me, as I desire, to
unite myself with you; we can rejoice together, seeing
that the divine power has made use of our
instrumentality for destroying the evil designs of the
devil, and thus causing faith, peace, and unity to
flourish amongst us. May God graciously protect you,
my beloved brethren."
This is the wording of the actual historical document
which led the institutional church into the apostasy
(departure from the true faith) that led to the complete
abandonment of the Sabbath. The heart of the issue was
the Passover; it is referred to historically as the
QUARTODECIMAN CONTROVERSY (Quartodeciman means "the
fourteenth"). The change that occurred was one of a
radical shift from the Passover, which was observed by
the Church according to the Jewish calculation of the
calendar (on Abib 14-regardless on what day of the week
it fell), to Easter Sunday. In other words the
change was from a DATE of the month (the fourteenth of
Abib) to a DAY of the week, Sunday.
Making Sunday as a day of special honor for Christians
was very attractive to the Romans because the seventh
day of the pagan week (named after Saturn) was
considered an unlucky day, and also because the Jewish
Sabbath had become a special object of ridicule and
scorn-owing to the Roman persecution of the Jewish
people. Constantine, both a Roman and a pagan, led "the
Christian Church" in this religio/political coup. Thus,
we see the rationale for the change of the Sabbath to
the legal sanctification of Sunday as having occurred in
relation to this change of the Passover to Easter.
From Constantine's letter, it is clear that the basis
for this drastic change was not founded upon any Bible
doctrine nor any Scriptural proof texts, which
Christians (especially Sabbatarians) give as reasons
today. The change, for whatever other possible reason,
was blatantly based on anti-Judaism, which became
anti-semitism (even anti-Israel). This decision, by the
ecumenical Nicene council, exempted "the Universal
(Catholic) Church," in its opinion, from following the
Scriptural commands of the Sabbath and the Holy
Feasts-such as the Passover.
"The Church" equated obedience to these Scriptural
mandates with following Judaism (today-called "being
under the Law"). They supposed, since the Jews were so
proud of observing the Sabbath and Holy Feasts, that if
"Christians" also followed these "Jewish" things, then
they would be in league with Judaism. Of course, since
many in Judaism (but not all) denied the truth of Jesus
as the Messiah, "the Church" thought keeping the Sabbath
and Passover would be equated as associating with those
who deny Christ. (This, of course, was a false doctrine
which overcame "the Church.")
Centuries later, almost all Christians and Jews are
affected by this apostasy. Most Christians think of
Sunday and Easter as Biblically mandated Holy Days, and
are totally ignorant of the origin of the false doctrine
which they believe. Also, there are many Jewish people
who think of Jesus as leader of a Gentile (thus pagan)
religion, forgetting His Jewishness and His epic defense
of the Torah as a Rabbi.
Both mainstream Rabbinic Judaism and mainstream
Christianity stubbornly follow their respective
traditions: voicing the idea that to do otherwise would
leave one either "not a Jew" or "not a Christian." The
few Christians who faithfully keep the Jewish Sabbath
and enjoy the Jewish Holy Feasts are consigned to being
a cult by mainstream Christianity. They are mostly not
respected as real Christians or second
class Christians at best. Likewise, the minority of
Jewish people who accept Jesus as Israel's valid Messiah
are viewed as traitors and apostate Jews by the
mainstream Jewish community; by some they are even
likened to being "nonpersons."
This "anti-Christian" stigma attached to the observance
of the Bible (Jewish) Sabbath has resulted in a strange
religious neurosis by some Sabbatarians who, while
observing the Sabbath, also observe "Easter" as a way of
appeasing their cultic consciences and evangelical
suspicions. Even among Sabbatarians, those who observe
the Quartodeciman Christian Passover festival (as the
early church did) are seen as "Judaizers" (or "under the
law"), not realizing that such theological descriptions
were used as justification for the anti-Semitism of "the
early Church." This anti-Semitism was the inspiration
behind a new hermeneutic which distorted the same New
Testament Scriptures that were misconstrued as proof
texts-not only by Protestant evangelicals against
the Bible Sabbath, but also by some Sabbath-keepers
against the Biblical Holy Days.
We, as Sabbatarians, must face the truth of this
history-if we are to ever effectively confront the
threat presented to us by the so-called "New Covenant
Theology" (NCT). Our inability to face our history and
to acknowledge the consequences that this history has
made on our Sabbatarian traditions and doctrines leave
us both vulnerable and victims to the NCT. Many
Sabbatarians consider the "Church-State" decree of the
Nicene Council of 325 AD as the cap stone event or the
pivotal point in history that fulfilled the prophecy of
the great power represented by a beast with 10 horns
(Daniel 7:25), of whom it was said he shall "think
to change times and laws." But I think many would
balk at the actually meaning of the Hebrew/Aramaic text
and the real evidence that points to its actual
historical fulfillment.
"And he shall speak great words against the Most
High [God], and shall wear out the saints of the Most
High, and think to change the
times [of sacred feasts and Holy Days]
and the law" (Daniel 7:25- The
Amplified Bible; [brackets belong]). Also see Genesius
Hebrew-Chaldee Lexicon to the Old Testament, p.248-
"times, a set time... Used of holy times (feast days)
Dan. 7:25."
"In determining what days should be regarded as holy,
and in the composition of a prayer for national use,
Constantine exercised one of the rights
belonging to him as Pontifex Maximus; and it
caused no surprise that he should do this." -Drury's
History of Rome, Chap. 57, part I, par. 4 from the end,
Quoted in A.T. Jones' The Two Republics, p. 319.
"I have offered and still offer $1000 to any one who can
prove to me from the Bible alone that I am bound, under
grievous sin to keep Sunday holy. It was the
Catholic Church which made the law obliging us to keep
Sunday holy. The Church made this law long
after the Bible was written. Hence said law is not in
the Bible. Christ, our Lord empowered his church to make
laws binding in conscience. He said to his apostles and
their lawful successors in the priesthood, 'Whatever you
shall bind on earth shall be binding in heaven.'
Matt.16.19. Matt. 18:17. Luke 16.19. The
Catholic Church abolished, not only the Sabbath, but all
the other Jewish festivals."- T. Enright CSSR,
St. Alphonsus (Rock) Church, St. Louis, June 1905.
Someone should have informed Constantine and the Nicene
council that the law was "done away" or that the Sabbath
and the festivals were "nailed to the cross." You will
note that the Catholic church does not use any of the
classic "proof texts" that are traditionally used by
Protestant evangelicals against the Sabbath (which, I
repeat, are the very same texts used by Sabbath-keepers
against holy days and festivals). It was this act
(engineered in 325 AD by the Nicene council), that the
Catholic church claims for itself, and that inspired a
new hermeneutic of "certain proof texts" (traditionally
used against Sabbatarians), which
justified the anti-Judaism of the early church and the
neo-anti-Judaic NCT teaching today.
No one would dare accuse a Christian of being
anti-Semitic or anti-Judaic in attitude, doctrine and
belief (a real Christian would not admit to such
either). Yet, the "Sunday roots" origins, that gave
birth to our hermeneutical devices, by which we formed
our doctrines-betray us, as Christians generally (and
particularly for Sabbatarians), and holds us hostage to
a contradictory and inconsistent Sabbatarian theology
that commands Sabbath observance on the one hand while
condemning festival observance on the
other.... Fundamental to this dilemma is how these
hermeneutical devices have formed our theology regarding
the law of God.
The majority of Sabbatarians even those who observe the
Holy Days are unwilling and unwitting victims to a
inherited theology of "the law"-that defines "the law"
as two monolithic divisions called "moral" and
"ceremonial." These very definitions ascribed to God's
law, are not only unbiblical, but were coined by
medieval theologians specifically to do away
with the Sabbath! And yet, we use these terms designed
to do away with the Sabbath in trying to defend
it. These very terms and concepts buttress our
contradictory Sabbatarian arguments. The logical
inconsistency of our traditional Sabbatarian doctrines
and our defenses of them are becoming ever increasingly
apparent by anyone who is being challenged by the
teachings of the NCT.
These are matters that should be of grave and serious
concerns to all classes of Sabbath-keepers requiring
immediate attention and focus. Discussion forums,
Sabbath seminars and conferences that can provide the
venue for the airing of these concerns-which bring the
issues to the fore and that invite the participation of
Sabbath-keepers, are encouraged. There are many things
that may divide us doctrinally in the ranks of
Sabbath-keepers, but as Sabbath-keepers we will stand or
fall on a the Sabbath truth we have in common.
It is time that we come to terms and reexamine our
"Sunday roots" if we would make certain of our "Sabbath
roots." Let us come together, open our doors, break down
the barriers, tear down the walls and come to the table
of dialog for our common good.
He who has an ear ....
TSS
May - June 2000 The Sabbath Sentinel
|