|
May - June 2000 The Sabbath Sentinel
Editoral . . .
An Appropriate Topic?
by Royce Mitchell, Jr.
|
|
What constitutes a "proper" subject for The
Sabbath Sentinel? Is adherence to the
doctrinal beliefs of any one sect or group of people a
proper path for the leadership of the Bible Sabbath
Association? If so, how should we decide who has the
correct "doctrine?"
These questions came to me as a result of a letter
received from a former BSA board member. He wrote
complaining of an article about the annual Sabbaths. His
concerns were so forcefully proposed that I felt it
proper to address them in this month's editorial.
The majority of his letter concerned the reasons for
not recognizing those annual
Sabbaths. Certainly, everyone is entitled to his
opinion, whether or not I or anyone else agree with
it. Yet, another statement of his caused me special
concern-concern that our message is not getting out to
our friends as well as it ought to be.
He wrote: "Please do not allow the teaching,
[that] these yearly Sabbaths should today be
observed, enter into the teachings of the
BSA and in The
Sabbath Sentinel." He goes on to state,
"... make theBible Sabbath
Association appealing to
allgroups of Sabbatarian Christians; avoid
controversial issues where possible."
The question that comes to mind is this; what is the
purpose of The Sabbath Sentinel? Is it solely to list
points upon which we can all agree? Certainly, we can
all agree that the Sabbath is the Lord's. Certainly we
can all agree that the Sabbath was made for man-but, is
our agreement on this point a valid reason for
publishing a bimonthly magazine?
There is one particularly pertinent question
that we should ask ourselves here. Who reads
The Sabbath Sentinel? We have
members of (at least) the following Sabbatarian groups
among our readers: Seventh Day Adventist, Seventh Day
Baptist, Church of God, Seventh Day, Sacred Names
congregations, Church of God groups, Independent
Sabbatarian congregations, Latter Day Saints-Strangites.
This is quite a diverse group of Sabbatarians! All of
these groups hold certain views or doctrines:
singularities which make them distinct from the
others. While such differences are what make each
unique, should The Sabbath
Sentinel adopt a particular viewpoint of
any one of them? Would not that be our undoing?
So, how should we handle articles from our brethren
which might not correspond to our own viewpoint? Should
TSS not
print those articles? Should we avoid such controversy?
The answer to this can be found if we simply
look clearly into what our mission is supposed to
be. The BSA board meeting in
January reiterated that we are to promote not only our
Lord and Savior, but also His Will for us: cooperation
among Sabbatarians (John 17). This has been the mission
of BSA for many years.
For the sake of cooperatively promoting God's plan and
purpose, can we set aside our differences and still
lovingly work to resolve them? Too many of our arguments
have gotten ugly-such do not serve God. Should
TSS become a forum for these
arguments? Again, this would greatly
risk defeating our purpose. Yet, we
must have a Godly freedom of expression that
allows for the positive growth of us all. God's Holy
Spirit of Love always has the answer.
What is a better use of the editorial process? Is it to
censor all items that differ from what I believe? Or, is
it to allow those which express what our brothers
believe, but to edit out those comments which insist
that we must comply with what they believe?
Should I allow an article that supports the idea that
only the weekly Sabbaths were intended for
observance-and then not allow an article
supporting the yearly Sabbaths? We Sabbatarians do have
our various differences. Where, my friends, does one
draw the line?
It is important to me that we, as brethren, come to
understand and accept one another for what we are: the
begotten Children of the Eternal God. It is important
for us to understand that we all are at different levels
of understanding, and that we don't perfectly
know who is correct in some of the things which
we believe. It is important to me that we don't see our
brothers as wrong, but as brothers merely of a different
opinion.
Having considered all of the questions posed here, it is
clear to me that our differences are what makes us
unique. Those differences do not make us wrong. Indeed,
in understanding our differences we can come to see that
those differences provide an opportunity for growth, for
both ourselves and our brother.
If we take the time to understand what our brother
thinks, then we show the appropriate respect for our
brother that is pleasing to our Father, and we show a
healthy respect for our brother that engenders respect
for our own beliefs.
Therefore, The Sabbath
Sentinel should be a tool of education and
communication. It should inform us on what our brethren
are doing and it should enlighten us about what our
brethren believe. This "information" must be in a way
that does not call our conversion, nor
the conversion of our brothers, into question. We
should not shy away from articles that explain why-or
what-our brothers believe differently from us,
nor should we shy away from articles
that cause us to reconsider the things we believe.
Our articles should not shy away from teaching us about
our brothers-brothers whom we must grow to love,
understand, and work with. Yet, we must also walk the
fine [straight] line of not granting such writing as
would offensively call various
Sabbatarian beliefs into question, or which would
insinuate that others have sinful beliefs. We should
allow education, not castigation;
... edification not pontification.
The Sabbath Sentinel has a
goal set for it. That goal has not changed in
decades. Part of that goal is to promote understanding
and cooperation.
These noble [almost synonymous] attributes do not come
from ignorance of what our brother thinks. Understanding
and cooperation are achieved through knowledge and
understanding of what our brother thinks-even if we do
not believe it ourselves.
There is an apt bit of wisdom which I learned a while
ago. I don't remember where I got it, but it has stuck
with me. That saying is this: "You do not love somebody
because; you love them in spite of."
We are all brethren in Christ-called according to His
purpose. God has given us a measure of His Holy
Spirit. While this blesses us with a growing
understanding, it is not all the same. Yet, He has also
given us the tools to overcome our prejudices and to
demonstrate that His Way is the only right Way.
Love is the only true Way to show that we are Christ's
disciples. Love is not done in ignorance; it is done
with knowledge and acceptance. Because The
Sabbath Sentinel is more about Love than
doctrines-we will continue to grow in grace and continue
to be fruitful in the knowledge of our Lord and Savior
Jesus Christ.
TSS
May - June 2000 The Sabbath Sentinel
|